Tillbaks till start.

 International aid.

Problems with international aid.

Most of the people involved in aid do have big and fair ambitions to contribute and help people in need. Their efforts motivates donations and when money there are it also attracts people with no ethical standard at all. People that do everything possibel to financial benefit on donations and voluntary work and feeds corruption and criminals in regions where the needs are most urgent. 

Global Scientific Authority brand control.

Global Scientific Authority is total financial independent and by revenue from copyright selfsupplied with an outstanding financial capability. Global Scientific Authority is not a doner but can and will do investments with very fair conditions where the human revenue is maximized. It is for Global Scientific Authority a main interest to struggle with corruption and keep costs for corruption out of  investments. Global Scientific Authority will not reject aid-organisations to participate in Global Scientific Authority projects. Global Scientific Authority brand has to be protected and will reject all aid-organisations that do not fulfill the anticorruptions ethical standards or do not accept anticorruption work and controles used by Global Scientific Authority.

Aid-organisations main asset are the brand that has to convince doners to donate. A by Global Scientific Authority rejection to be a partner will be devastating for an aid-organisation. To reject a try to be a Scientific Global Authority qualified and accepted partner will be even more harmful for an aid-organisation credibility. There will most probably be a very big reduction of  international aid-organisation but the accepted organisations credibility will raise and so also the donors and donations. Global Scientific Authority will be seen as a guaratee to serve the purposes and not feed corruption.

Time for aid-organisations to start anti-corruption work and controles.

Aid-organisations main asset are the brand that has to convince doners to donate. A by Global Scientific Authority rejection to be a partner will be devastating for an aid-organisation. To reject a try to be a Scientific Global Authority qualified partner will be even more harmful for aid-organisation credibility. There will most probably be a very big reduction of  international aid-organisation but the accepted organisations credibility will raise as there is a guaratee to serve the purposes and not feed corruption.

As soon as the Medeiterranean refill 3500 B.C.  is common known it will be very urgent for aid-organisations to qualify. Those who not are able to do will ruin their credibility, lose donors trust and lose their the donations. There will soon be a very big sort out of fake and corrupt aid-organisations. For the aid-purpose a reorganisation of international aid will probably dubbel or trippel the efficiency of donations. Good and honest aid-organisation will also very much benefit by the Scientific Global Authority controls of ethical standards and will eager to be quilified as partners.

Global Scientific Authority engagement into international aid will withdraw vultures their dish.

 

Tillbaks till start.


Carl Festin